| >> |
No.6549
File: 1729850694521310.png
-(441024 KB, 716x537, 1729850694521310.png)
I worked as a teacher for many years, Ages 3-18+ in both public and private settings. I love children (paternally) and did indeed find the role extremely fulfilling. My students enjoyed their classes and respected me because I genuinely cared and wanted the best for them.
But I also love children sexually. To be more specific, adolescents, of puberty age. This is normal. Why would it not be? Modern moral standards make no distinction between pre and post puberty, which is simply wrong biologically. Prepubescent kids do not look or act like lolis and are not sexually attractive except in "true" pedophilia, which is statistically rare and has roots in sadism/power rather than lust. Now, kids may have nice features such as a pretty face or soft skin, but before puberty those do not provoke sexual arousal. They do however indicate future attractiveness, which is why kids can still be lets say appealing.
An anecdote: I taught a girl from 10 until 14. Ages 10 to 11 she was just a cute kid, a bit plain. At 12, there came the day I noticed that her breasts had just started budding under her shirt. That was the day I stopped seeing her as a child.
To be clear, I was extremely professional and never acted inappropriately with any student. After all, I love kids and don't have any desire to hurt them. But I can't say I would be against a consensual relationship with a young girl.
You might argue that someone under 18 can't consent, and you are entitled to your opinion. I'll just say this, postpubescent kids are not innocent at all. Let's not pretend that they're chaste little angels. I've had to ignore more than a handful of 14yo's dressing in hot pants and acting flirty, because I'm not stupid enough to misinterpret it as anything more than using their new-found assets to experiment with attracting male attention.
|
