What the hell.

Pizza?

Please don't, I am not looking towards reversing the entirety of the image metadata cleanup from the 4chan code. mailto:sage Anyway, spoiler test.

>>1612 Aha, so the thumb is still generated. Should at least make it removable on hover then...

Well, while we are at it... This is most definitely a .png

test

Virus

>>1597 >>1689 ---- Chunk # 2 ---- Chunk Offset: 0x21 Chunk Length: 9 bytes Chunk Type: pHYs Chunk Importance: Ancillary Chunk Data: 0x00000b1300000b1301 Chunk CRC: 9a9c18 oh wow it's literally nothing go fuck yourself

>>2796 Is that a virus?

>>1597 >/cpg/ Child Pornography General?

>>4409 Cheese Pizza Gastropub

i just like the cc otherwise it was not worth being put on a watchlist. also anon are u srsly upset it was nothingburger? we are doomed!

pornography starring your mother

>>1597 Not really sure what this does. At best it lets you send messages embedded in an image?

Genuine question: Why is pedophilia so prevalent, especially on the internet? Everywhere I look, there are pedos and lolicons online, with dedicated boards or threads for kids. I've grown mainly indifferent to them, but at the same time, how come? What makes kids attractive? And why indulge into the thoughts, if you know they might end up in legal repercussions?

>>5675 Youth is directly correlated with fertility People generally have low impulse control next

>>5675 >And why indulge into the thoughts, if you know they might end up in legal repercussions? Because thoughts are not a crime. You have cartoon violence, you have cartoon drugs, you have cartoon porn. As shrimple as that.

>>5686 I don't think that exactly answers the question

>>5686 Thoughts are crimes in societies that try to prevent crimes and social harm. Even just generating 2d lolis is a crime in many countries. I know it might sound asinine, alien, etc. but that's just the way things are and likely how they are going to evolve world wide.

>>5689 They literally aren't. >generating 2d lolis Is not a thought process and results in producing an end product. You are still free to rotate a 2d loli in your mind.

>>5688 There is no point answering a misguided question. Tell me, have you stopped beating your wife?

>>5675 i don't really see it that much outside of 4chan type spaces. i think lolicons are mostly just lonely men who figured if they are going to stay an awkward anime-obsessed virgin for the foreseeable future they might as well go all in on the depravity of their fetishes. as for actual paedos attracted to real life pre-pubescent children, your guess is as good as mine.

>>5699 > You are still free to rotate a 2d loli in your mind. Yes, but you aren't free to rotate a 2d loli in someone's else mind, that's a crime.

>>5705 >i don't really see it that much outside of 4chan type spaces. They're the only places where they're allowed to post freely

>>5705 I see it a lot on discords, pixivs and twitters as well.

>>5702 >Tell me, have you stopped beating your wife? you find these questions offensive? for what reason?

>>5732 If I were able to rotate anything in someone else's mind, I'd be wanted as a first known psychic. >>5745 That's an example of a flawed question, you dingus. I see you have not replied to it, so my argument by example worked.

>>5702 What part of that question is "misguided"? Your answer was misguided as it does not answer the question.

Anyway >Why is actionable pedophilia so prevalent It really isn't. But maybe you have statistics to prove otherwise? >Why is imaginary pedophilia so prevalent Because the culture is shaped by the young as the people with most free time and least amount of brains to control their spending or lust, so they will find attachment to anything even remotely taboo and horny to be cool. The counter-culture would swing back eventually, but with recent rise on censorship on console releases it's hard to predict the trend. >Why is X prevalent on the internet? It's not, but it is easy to find an echo chamber. >Everywhere I look, there are pedos and lolicons online, with dedicated boards or threads for kids. That really mostly speaks about you. Have you tried relocating to NBA forums? Or, I don't know, Slashdot?

Kids these day really pretend to be pedophiles to be cool

>>5766 >That really mostly speaks about you. I guess it does. I tried to play it cool, but honestly I'm extremely disturbed by the fact that some people enjoy depriving children of their innocence. I keep seeing it in the news, social media, etc. I won't judge harshly because I understand these types of drives are just written in the DNA of certain individuals and they have to carry that curse of evolution and many have accepted their personal repression, but at the same time, indulging the fantasy in a public enviroment is simply not good. Even if I keep trying to distract myself, the thought always goes back to children and their safety, and all the terrible crimes I've witnessed keep flooding into my brain. Seeing the harunanon posting "SEX with CHILDREN" every day for the past months and now this thread has also been really hard on the mind. I just hope you anons never hurt anyone, that's all.

>>5800 I won't let anyone else sex the children anon. I will do it all myself, don't worry

>>5800 While it is impossible to speak of people you don't know or of a collective with dynamic membership, I believe people here would be fine. Last I recall, there were several posts telling not to do it when repomeido released his guide how to teach people mahjong in the local park. But yeah, playing up of the antics can be annoying. Thanks for the concern though!

>>5800 Also, care to explain how come your atarashiako-10.png is 14KB 14KB larger than the version from the repo, in the dedicated steganography thread?

>>5800 Damn, you sound like an absolute retard

>>5750 indulging these fetish has clearly social repercussion . and in some country legals one. even in the case it wasn't true is simply a stupid question; not a "flawed qurstion" like your example. ps. I tought you meant that the question was offensive in some way.

>>5675 Because early chan culture started joking about funny taboo thing so much that people who are unironically into it saw this as a space where they can blend in, all while hiding behind a veneer of plausible deniability. And eventually, as chans developed more and more of a reputation for it, the people who are uncomfortable stop joking and leave, while the people who are too comfortable stay and become emboldened. We are who we pretend to be.

>>5675 for the not gay pedo ,my theory is that is simply confused men that confuse what is cute and appealing with something of a sexual nature(other example of something similare are furry). >>5683 this as well

>>5862 >this as well to be more clear you would expect far more signifiers of fertility for this to be a primary factor. it still is a compounding factor tough. >low impulse control is correlated but i dunno how.

historically women's peak child rearing years were around ~12

I may be too much of a brainlet for this, any images I can test decryption with?

>>5954 amaekoromo-3 pass is empty

>>5800 >but honestly I'm extremely disturbed by the fact that some people enjoy depriving children of their innocence. you have to be someone with low IQ and no impulse control(a psychopath) to start molesting children. I doubt you will find any child molester here >many have accepted their personal repression, but at the same time, indulging the fantasy in a public enviroment is simply not good. you can channel these tendency in positive or negative way; for example tons of male teacher have these tendency, and find teaching to children, particularly fullfilling; or you could be wasting time on some forum. I doubt the shitposting is gonna have any real effect outside of mindbreaking some anons... >Even if I keep trying to distract myself, the thought always goes back to children and their safety, and all the terrible crimes I've witnessed keep flooding into my brain. i recomend you to simply stop watching and listening to any news none of them are usefull in any way or significant to your daily life. >>5875 the low impulse control might come from the fact that we are talking about terminaly online people

>>5954 >>5972 looks like that got stripped somewhere idk. https://litter.catbox.moe/poyrkr.png

>>5992 Yeah I guess stuff gets stripped on upload, but this is fun

>>5982 >you have to be someone with low IQ and no impulse control(a psychopath) to start molesting children. What about people that know they'll get away no matter what? >you can channel these tendency in positive or negative way; for example tons of male teacher have these tendency, and find teaching to children, particularly fullfilling; Ironic that you mention male teachers, because a guy that I know got away with it plenty of times and never got in trouble for decades due to lack of evidence, is a male teacher in my area. And I know for a fact he's guilty because he kept offering me money to masturbate in front of him or let him touch me. He just stalks isolated kids and baits them with lots of money. Mind you, he's never been violent or anything, but he was a creep doing something illegal and mentally jarring kids with sexual advances. He's been accused plenty of times, he's somewhat of a famous pedo in our area, but nobody has ever done anything about it, likely because he's rich, pretty, fit, has a good looking wife so why would he go for kids in the middle of fucking nowhere? That's why I'm concerned about these types of things. People are greedy, and if they know there won't be any repercussions they'll take everything they can.

I worked as a teacher for many years, Ages 3-18+ in both public and private settings. I love children (paternally) and did indeed find the role extremely fulfilling. My students enjoyed their classes and respected me because I genuinely cared and wanted the best for them. But I also love children sexually. To be more specific, adolescents, of puberty age. This is normal. Why would it not be? Modern moral standards make no distinction between pre and post puberty, which is simply wrong biologically. Prepubescent kids do not look or act like lolis and are not sexually attractive except in "true" pedophilia, which is statistically rare and has roots in sadism/power rather than lust. Now, kids may have nice features such as a pretty face or soft skin, but before puberty those do not provoke sexual arousal. They do however indicate future attractiveness, which is why kids can still be lets say appealing. An anecdote: I taught a girl from 10 until 14. Ages 10 to 11 she was just a cute kid, a bit plain. At 12, there came the day I noticed that her breasts had just started budding under her shirt. That was the day I stopped seeing her as a child. To be clear, I was extremely professional and never acted inappropriately with any student. After all, I love kids and don't have any desire to hurt them. But I can't say I would be against a consensual relationship with a young girl. You might argue that someone under 18 can't consent, and you are entitled to your opinion. I'll just say this, postpubescent kids are not innocent at all. Let's not pretend that they're chaste little angels. I've had to ignore more than a handful of 14yo's dressing in hot pants and acting flirty, because I'm not stupid enough to misinterpret it as anything more than using their new-found assets to experiment with attracting male attention.

I just ritual post and jerk off

>>6549 Daily reminder the average age or first sex for women is <16

Is this a confessional thread?

>>6613 Females over 10 years old barely qualify as human

>>6716 I confess I'm into adult women

>>6716 I love pubes

[spoiler]https://files.catbox.moe/xcxjhp.gif[/spoiler]

>>7991 damn brat

>>6549 Most girls are just annoying though there are a few angels